News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:All Programming Languages are Wrong (2018) by erezsh on Wednesday February 12, 2020 @02:47AM (#22306769)
The author has a good point, although he miscommunicates it: The common use-cases, such as servers, business logic, glue code, etc., don't usually require hyper-optimized performance. It only needs to be reasonable and predictable.

They need a language that is easy to work with, and share with others, and there are few that really do that.

But of course, there are. Go, Python, Julia and others I'm sure, all prioritize comfort over performance. Although, as compilers improve, they might one day actually become faster -- since the user writes more abstractly, there is a wider search space for optimizations.

Re:All Programming Languages are Wrong (2018) by eigenspace on Thursday February 13, 2020 @06:20PM (#22322374)
Julia does not prioritize comfort over (runtime) performance. The entire language is based around developing clever ways to get zero runtime cost abstractions.
Re:All Programming Languages are Wrong (2018) by random_guy1234 on Wednesday February 12, 2020 @04:49AM (#22307437)
> But of course, there are

Your statements are contradictory.

> they might one day actually become faster

faster compared to C/C++ ? Of course, Performance is improving day by day. What's the point?

Re:All Programming Languages are Wrong (2018) by erezsh on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @04:12PM (#22417513)
It's not contradictory. I'm saying that the things he says are true, and there are many languages that follow that line of thought.

Yes, faster than C++. Better abstractions can, sometimes, give the compiler more flexibility to optimize.