Nice! I find this a lot more readable than the Scheme, and it certainly contains many fewer tokens; what do you think?
Re:I Was Wrong about Nix
by diffeomorphism on Tuesday February 11, 2020 @05:04AM
(#22297335)
That looks almost identical to the Scheme one with the only real difference being foo=bar; vs (foo bar).
Hardly enough of a difference to change anything "a lot" either way.
Guix package definitions were unreadable to me initially, as I had never used Scheme/Lisp before.
I've written a couple of them now and the definition above is extremely easy to read. Big part is just formatting & parentheses, I think my eyes just needed a little bit of adjustment time.
Re:I Was Wrong about Nix
by svd4anything on Wednesday February 12, 2020 @11:48AM
(#22310359)
It’s absolutely more readable.
Here's the trimmed Nix derivation: