I'm not sure I see your point
Apple music = Amazon music = DRM free
Apple iBooks = Amazon Kindle books = incl DRM
Apple movies = Netflix = everyone else = incl DRM
Correct.
Apple iBooks = Amazon Kindle books = incl DRM
Apple movies = Netflix = everyone else = incl DRM
Less correct. Kindle and Netflix have DRM, but they don't have the platform lock-in of iBooks and movies. iBooks, as far as I know, is only available on iOS. DRM is bad, but DRM that's tied to a smaller range of platforms is even worse.
2) Amazon's VOD service provides DRMed video, too.
Then what's the issue?
That's the problem. The DRM locks it to Apple only software and/or hardware.
So yeah, the DRM is still there, but if you're not happy with the way Samsung is doing things, you can hop to LG or Sony just as easily.
Compare with Apple where if you bought video content on iTunes and don't like the AppleTV... well... tough.
> Not to mention the fact that users have built up libraries of dozens of applications and DRM-laden content that won’t transfer between devices.
What you say is (emphasis added):
> The article makes another great point about people not being able to leave iOS devices for a competitor because all their music, movies, apps, etc are in Apple's DRM format and won't transfer to other devices.
Music is DRM-free on iTunes and has been for some time. TV shows and movies are another matter and have other issues (such as only one download), which is why I won't buy them from there.
But it's not Apple demanding DRM. It's the content producers, who are still until the woeful delusion that DRM prevents copying. In reality it simply annoys customers. The only reason music is DRM-free on iTunes is because Apple extracted that concession as part of a deal that gave the RIAA three pricing bands for songs ($0.69, $0.99 and $1.29, which basically means $1.29 for anything new) over the previous model, which was $0.99 for everything.