Re:Rongorongo
by echelon on Monday February 10, 2020 @05:51AM
(#22287997)
I am all for that, but the article seems to imply there is still a lack of consensus about the character set. It'd be a shame to commit this to Unicode and have to revise it later.
What would the process for that even look like? We wouldn't want to change the meaning of the code points as it could render scientific documents using them incorrect.
Re:Rongorongo
by cooper12 on Monday February 10, 2020 @11:53AM
(#22290815)
From what I've seen, the Unicode blocks are left with space for suspected additions, though big change groups are usually added as extensions. Any erroneous additions could be marked as deprecated.
What would the process for that even look like? We wouldn't want to change the meaning of the code points as it could render scientific documents using them incorrect.