Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Linux 5.6 is the most exciting kernel in years. Parent comment
> "BFQ merged a couple of years ago."
Okay, got it. My question was driven by confusion of what exactly was package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-rt-bfq/ . Reading now the wiki in GitHub ( https://github.com/sirlucjan/bfq-mq-lucjan/wiki ), it's clear:
> Development version of BFQ
> The development version of BFQ [...] differs from the production version in that:
> - it contains commits not available for that kernel version;
> - it contains a lot of consistency checks to detect possible malfunctions.
So, linux-rt-bfq is linux-rt, sprinkled with extra fixes to bfq unmerged yet to mainline.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
> "BFQ merged a couple of years ago."
Okay, got it. My question was driven by confusion of what exactly was package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-rt-bfq/ . Reading now the wiki in GitHub ( https://github.com/sirlucjan/bfq-mq-lucjan/wiki ), it's clear:
> Development version of BFQ
> The development version of BFQ [...] differs from the production version in that:
> - it contains commits not available for that kernel version;
> - it contains a lot of consistency checks to detect possible malfunctions.
So, linux-rt-bfq is linux-rt, sprinkled with extra fixes to bfq unmerged yet to mainline.