Re:In what cases is Java faster than C++?
by blinkingled on Wednesday February 16, 2011 @04:47PM
(#2228466)
Strictly speaking, what you say is true, but practically those are significant and relevant benefits of Java.
Considering that performance is always a trade-off with price - if you think about price/performance ratio - the ability to write programs quickly is of relevance.
In case that wasn't clear, he claims not that garbage collection is more efficient, but the saved programmer time can be used in some hand-waving way to improve efficiency. Likewise he wanders off into wooly territory with the claim that very large Java programs can be written more quickly. These would be perfectly fine if he were posting the reasons he thinks Java is better, but in a technical discussion of all-out performance it's just offtopic.