Re:Critical Bluetooth vulnerability in Android
by nicolaslem on Friday February 07, 2020 @06:36AM
(#22265052)
This is why my next phone will be a Librem 5. I know that it will probably suck but at least it's moving things in the right direction.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Critical Bluetooth vulnerability in Android
by ekianjo on Friday February 07, 2020 @08:00AM
(#22265516)
> my next phone will be a Librem 5.
Better go with a Pinephone if everything that's been written about Librem as a company is even half-true.
Re:Critical Bluetooth vulnerability in Android
by madez on Friday February 07, 2020 @06:55AM
(#22265144)
I'm in the same boat. If it moves things in the right direction, then it doesn't suck.
Re:Critical Bluetooth vulnerability in Android
by prox on Friday February 07, 2020 @07:38AM
(#22265387)
Indeed! I usually get “but it’s still a closed source modem” as a counterpoint ... sigh
Re:Critical Bluetooth vulnerability in Android
by squarefoot on Friday February 07, 2020 @08:07AM
(#22265574)
The closed source modem, or network firmware for that matter, isn't much of a problem if it can't see clear data and/or access to system memory or execute instructions.
I'd see it more of a black box not unlike old RS232 connected modems: they could see all data going back and forth, but encrypting that data would be enough since they could never access the system memory to see the data before encryption or after decryption. Librem 5 and Pinephone should work along these lines. Having everything 100% open would be better, but in this case being closed doesn't create security concerns since all personal data is unavailable to these subsystems; only the main system, which is entirely open and where the user is king, can access them.