Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by safety-third on Friday February 07, 2020 @05:52PM
(#22271999)
I have personally hired false positives. Like you say, they are expensive. I have never once hired someone who was literally incapable of doing the job. It's never because of work directly. A person who was incredibly professional in the interview turned into a massive asshole at the office. One fought good coding practices because he thought it was over-engineering. Another spent all day playing online poker on their phone. One spent their entire time at the office making Forth interpreters.
Doing 7 hours of whiteboarding interviews for every candidate won't flush out any of these. Not a single one. If you can tell me the magic 8 ball I need to shake to fix this, I am wide open to suggestions.
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by celticmusic on Friday February 07, 2020 @11:06PM
(#22273780)
> One fought good coding practices because he thought it was over-engineering.
You would have considered me a false positive then, despite the success of my career.
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by perl4ever on Saturday February 08, 2020 @12:07AM
(#22274035)
Nobody is perfect for every job.
A phone app is one thing, ERP or accounting is another, avionics is another.
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by celticmusic on Saturday February 08, 2020 @05:00AM
(#22274985)
ahahahahahahahahahaha, the arrogance in this comment cracks me up. You have no idea the software I write, don't make assumptions.
I'd rather that happen, than hire unqualified people. Hire and then fire someone is damn expensive - months of salary and a lot of hours wasted. If you don't get them out of the door fast enough, the damage they can do with incompetency is even greater.