News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Watson crushes the competition in second round of 'Jeopardy' by gojomo on Wednesday February 16, 2011 @03:10AM (#2225625)
I wonder when Watson gets the textual clue: the instant the clue appears on screen? The moment Alex finishes reading it? A midpoint? Is it trickled word-by-word at about Alex's speaking or average human sight-reading rates?

If Watson has confidence at the moment ringing-in is allowed, it seems it will always win. So how much time it has to achieve that confidence, as a function of how the text is fed, may be more important than buzzer mechanics.

Based on the same general idea of a common starting point that motivates waiting until after the entire question has been read before allowing any ringing in, I could see there being a tiny 'common period' where all buzzes are considered as coming in simultaneously, with the person chosen to answer then being chosen in round-robin fashion (or for maximal drama, favoring whoever is behind). After the tiny common period, it would be strictly based on first-to-buzz.

It would take away a twitch-timing factor that has been important for human champions, too, but offer more fairness with regard to computers and even people with slight ticks or timing problems.

Re:Watson crushes the competition in second round of 'Jeopardy' by Cixelyn on Wednesday February 16, 2011 @04:23AM (#2225782)
The clue is given to Watson electronically the moment the clue appears on the screen.

While watching, I was actually hoping for really short questions which would cut down on Watson's time to process and possibly put Watson on more even footing with Jennings and Rutter.