Re:Nature will publish peer review reports as a trial
by bumby on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @08:11PM
(#22252603)
>Typically reviewers want to see shiny new ideas so if anything it over emphasizes innovation and discourages incremental improvements.
I know publications fetishize novelty, but wasn’t there research showing a high percentage of publication is either non-replicable or derivative and subsequently of little value once you remove auto-citations?
I know publications fetishize novelty, but wasn’t there research showing a high percentage of publication is either non-replicable or derivative and subsequently of little value once you remove auto-citations?