Re:Firefox Preview adds support for recommended extensions, ...
by clarry on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @03:32AM
(#22244998)
> In other words, make obligatory "force-feeding" of content? As in, people won't be allowed to close their eyes or cover their ears? Good luck with that...
I mean there are already rules in place that disallow modifying software, circumventing DRM, etc.
It wouldn't be a stretch to see them disallow modifying a website's contents.
Re:Firefox Preview adds support for recommended extensions, ...
by Old_Thrashbarg on Tuesday February 04, 2020 @10:05PM
(#22243647)
Forcing people to keep their eyes open during ads happened in Black Mirror, the "15 Million Merits" episode.
Re:Firefox Preview adds support for recommended extensions, ...
by lalaland1125 on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @01:57AM
(#22244618)
The way this would probably work is make EULAs carry significantly more legal weight. Such that visiting a website with adblock on becomes a crime if the EULA for that website explicitly doesn't allow adblockers (with some sort of very explicit notice like those cookie buttons).
In other words, make obligatory "force-feeding" of content? As in, people won't be allowed to close their eyes or cover their ears? Good luck with that...
On a less serious note: "If you outlaw those who block ads, only outlaws will block ads."