Re:Sand dunes can 'communicate' with each other
by thdrdt on Tuesday February 04, 2020 @01:40PM
(#22239301)
But why not use the word 'interact' instead?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sand dunes can 'communicate' with each other
by jessriedel on Tuesday February 04, 2020 @02:40PM
(#22240034)
If I were to speculate, and say it's probably because (1) they might not be interacting directly, and saying "(possibly indirectly) interacting" is a lot more syllables than "talking"; and (2) "talk"/"communicate" emphasizes the information-theoretic content, whereas "interact" is somewhat more likely to be interpreted in terms of interaction strength. (If two systems are "barely communicating", they are transferring a small number of bits, whereas if two systems are "barely interacting", the influence in displacement/impulse/temp/whatever is small.)
Re:Sand dunes can 'communicate' with each other
by asdfman123 on Tuesday February 04, 2020 @04:39PM
(#22241284)
Shannon's original paper was "A Mathematical Theory of Communication," which actually studied radio communication, it's since been generalized, and there's no reason to rename jargon so outsiders can better understand it.