> I'm looking at the picture in the article. You absolutely could not get a wheelchair up to that door without people carrying it. I'm aware of standing, and in this case it seems pretty clear cut.

In this case? Maybe. You made a statement about all the cases they brought. I responded to that general statement, not this specific case.

It's possible every suit they brought against a business was for a situation where people with disabilities really were harmed. If that's the situation, I'm not sure why someone with a real disability didn't bring the cases then.

There are reasons why people are required to have standing to bring a case. I think it's pretty obvious what some of those reasons are.

This has nothing to do with not being able to buy coffee, and everything to do with hurting the business in the hopes of getting a large settlement.