Re:Climate models are running red hot, and scientists don’t ...
by iongoatb on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:06AM
(#22224723)
...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Climate models are running red hot, and scientists don’t ...
by bentona on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:16AM
(#22224818)
I mostly somewhat agree with you but unless you find a more appealing package for your arguments, you're just going to exacerbate the bifurcation on issues like this, and definitely not convince or enlighten anyone.
Re:Climate models are running red hot, and scientists don’t ...
by screye on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:11AM
(#22224777)
I don't see how you brought socialism into any of this.
Ironically, socialism is being sold as a solution that you yourself make very clear. That, the pace of scientific progress is really fast ,and automation is going to make a lot of jobs obsolete.
Socialism (in the nordic sense, ie. capitalism with social welfare) is being proposed as a solution to rising inequality and unregulated for-profit forces in the free market of industries where the consumer has no choice. (medicine, education)
Re:Climate models are running red hot, and scientists don’t ...
by iongoatb on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:23AM
(#22224901)
Unbelievable that people believe that the Nordic model of capitalism is "socialism". Capitalism with social welfare is not socialism.
Re:Climate models are running red hot, and scientists don’t ...
by the_gastropod on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:38AM
(#22225057)
Socialism isn't as narrow a term as you seem to think it is... It's quite a broad concept that can (and does) coexist with Capitalism.