Re:Hard negotiations: why a softer approach yields better ou...
by WJW on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:18AM
(#22224848)
I didn't write "The difficult part is in correctly estimating which type of situation you are in." for nothing, and the hypothetical trinket vendor is just an example. Like you say, any situation where negotiating actually matters is unlikely to be about a one-time transaction.
That said, the GP comment was about trying to win the long game by sacrificing the short game, and I meant to point out that there is not always a long game and even if there is, not everyone subscribes to the same win/win philosophy and recognizing when your negotiating partner doesn't is a valuable life skill.
Re:Hard negotiations: why a softer approach yields better ou...
by scarejunba on Monday February 03, 2020 @01:41PM
(#22227411)
> I personally can't stand it when rich foreigners try to get a souvenir for a few dollars less than the list price.
If you don't haggle in haggle culture, you're missing out. It's just part of the experience.
Of course you may not enjoy it, in which case missing out is preferable but it serves many purposes.
Re:Hard negotiations: why a softer approach yields better ou...
by wool_gather on Monday February 03, 2020 @11:31AM
(#22225710)
> if previous people like you have played hardball with them in the past you might be starting out from a far worse perspective
Yep, this is an excellent point. The interaction doesn't quite take place in isolation: it's in a societal environment, and your actions can return to you through that network in some form.
I personally can't stand it when rich foreigners try to get a souvenir for a few dollars less than the list price. That infinitesimal fraction of your wealth doesn't matter to you; but it could make a big difference to them. And similarly, I hate when I have to treat business deals as if I'm negotiating with a hostile enemy, when we can both benefit.