Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by nirav72 on Sunday February 02, 2020 @10:19PM
(#22221162)
the key to sanity while on Reddit is to stay on the non-default & topic/your area of interest specific subs.
Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by aaron695 on Sunday February 02, 2020 @09:56PM
(#22221052)
> How can social media sites control quality of submitters.
I'd like to see how a system where downvotes have reasons given works? Slashdot tries for upvotes.
Currently you might be downvoted for being offtopic, but you might just think it's because someone disagrees politically.
It would be an interesting overlay to create for HN
Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by meddlepal on Sunday February 02, 2020 @11:46PM
(#22221478)
Make downvotes and upvotes an economy. You can't downvote what you don't have to spend. You can't post if your bankrupt of points.
Idea might need fine tuning.
Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by BostonEnginerd on Sunday February 02, 2020 @09:35PM
(#22220976)
Metafilter has maintained reasonably high levels of discussion and civility. Part of this is active mods, the other part is that an account costs some money to open.
Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by beamatronic on Sunday February 02, 2020 @10:57PM
(#22221314)
I’d pay for HN
Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by koolba on Sunday February 02, 2020 @11:30PM
(#22221426)
How much?
Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by beamatronic on Sunday February 02, 2020 @11:48PM
(#22221483)
It’s worth at least as much as the New York Times, which is $8 a month
Re:China to inject $174B of liquidity on Monday as markets r...
by koheripbal on Monday February 03, 2020 @01:05PM
(#22226981)
Metafilter has no threads and no comment voting (as far as I can see).
It's not really the same sort of experience.
It's more like a message board - which is too inefficient. Time ordered comments makes for poor content.
Reddit's content quality dropped significantly the moment they deployed their mobile app, though it had been on a downward decline for a while.
I've seen HN being discussed at length on Reddit as a better alternative for "adylts", but now we see the same slow decline here.
The important questions are...
1. How can social media sites control quality of submitters.
2. What is the next site everyone over 30 is moving to and how do we stop all these teenagers from following us? /s