Re:TypeScript’s quirks: How inconsistencies make the languag...
by bt4u on Saturday February 01, 2020 @04:41AM
(#22209652)
There's no such thing as an untyped programming language that's used in the real world. JavaScript and typescript definitely aren't. Maybe you mean dynamically typed
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:TypeScript’s quirks: How inconsistencies make the languag...
by Sharlin on Saturday February 01, 2020 @08:30AM
(#22210395)
This is just a question of semantics. In mainstream programming language jargon it’s ”dynamically typed”, while in (applied) type theory it’s ”untyped” or, perhaps more accurately ”monotyped” or ”unityped”, because types are fundamentally invariants of a program that can be verified without executing it.
Re:TypeScript’s quirks: How inconsistencies make the languag...
by heavenlyblue on Saturday February 01, 2020 @10:31AM
(#22211000)
There’s always that “intellectual” who would say something smart while being absolutely wrong.