Re:The EARN IT Act: how to ban end-to-end encryption without...
by pmiller2 on Friday January 31, 2020 @01:37PM
(#22204182)
True, but arguably it wasn’t intended to cause the specific types of damage it caused, and its actual targets suffered less than expected.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The EARN IT Act: how to ban end-to-end encryption without...
by DuskStar on Friday January 31, 2020 @02:52PM
(#22204958)
A cynical person would say that this is because the stated targets weren't actually the targets, just like with this act. (Stated targets: sex traffickers, real targets: tech companies offering e2e encryption)
Re:The EARN IT Act: how to ban end-to-end encryption without...
by xvector on Friday January 31, 2020 @03:27PM
(#22205308)
Yes, IMO FOSTA/SESTA were deliberately malicious and yet another successful attempt to force puritanical ideals upon our citizens, regardless of the damage it would cause.
The senators who initiated the bill are not dumb. They knew exactly how it would play out.
Re:The EARN IT Act: how to ban end-to-end encryption without...
by chimeracoder on Friday January 31, 2020 @03:39PM
(#22205444)
> The senators who initiated the bill are not dumb. They knew exactly how it would play out.
Blumenthal (who wrote SESTA and also this bill) was waging a war against consensual sex work for years, long before he was elected to the Senate.
The fallout from SESTA was not accidental; it was by design.
Re:The EARN IT Act: how to ban end-to-end encryption without...
by pjc50 on Friday January 31, 2020 @03:41PM
(#22205459)
The intended target was sex workers, far more so than pimps.
Re:The EARN IT Act: how to ban end-to-end encryption without...
by frandroid on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:06PM
(#22205737)
There was plenty of warning of the effects of these bills on sex workers. Legislators at best ignored them, and at worst were happy for these side effects, depending on where they sit of the political spectrum.