News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California's housing bill SB 50 has died in the state Senate by barry-cotter on Friday January 31, 2020 @07:43AM (#22201148)
Please consider reading the linked article.

Utilities are not a natural monopoly because we have multiple examples of competition lasting decades in municipalities. This is not compatible with the economic concept of natural monopoly. It’s a disproof by existence.

If you want to discourage too much digging up the street charge people to do it. If they’re doing too much charge more. Problem solved; the various companies that want to dig up will come to a mutually agreeable arrangement on cost sharing if they want to dig up the street.

Multiple competing companies going after the most profitable customers is very much not proof of the existence of natural monopoly. It’s also perfectly fine. If you want uneconomic customers served for reasons of equity pay for it. You can either pay for it directly and make the costs visible or you can mandate universal service and spread the costs across all customers. Either way the cost is paid; you don’t get anything for free.

Re:California's housing bill SB 50 has died in the state Senate by scarface74 on Friday January 31, 2020 @08:27AM (#22201457)
We have multiple examples in the 1920’s in large dense cities...

And as far as what happens when you let multiple companies dig up the streets that are willing to pay for it, we also have an example of what happens when a company decides to abandon an area when it’s not profitable and leaves the infrastructure and the streets in a mess. Google Fiber and shallow trenching....

https://www.cnet.com/news/google-fibers-secret-weapon-in-its...

What do you think is going to happen when these companies go out of business? Are we now also going to have multiple companies serving the last mile? What happens at the last mile when your water company goes out of business? How long will it take a competitor to get to your home?