News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California's housing bill SB 50 has died in the state Senate by arrosenberg on Friday January 31, 2020 @12:54AM (#22199440)
It seems like the common factor enforcing the monopoly is high capital cost as a barrier to entry. That moat allows monopolizing companies to focus their resources on capturing the state to maintain their monopoly status.

The remedy would seem to be for more decisive government action - to regulate or nationalize the infrastructure, break up the incumbents as necessary, and create a robust market for services that utilize the infrastructure and pay rents and taxes to the government.

Re:California's housing bill SB 50 has died in the state Senate by kortilla on Friday January 31, 2020 @03:09AM (#22199962)
Or strip the government of its power to enable monopolies in the first place.
Re:California's housing bill SB 50 has died in the state Senate by arrosenberg on Friday January 31, 2020 @11:46AM (#22203095)
We've already seen that show. SPOILER: The government didn't create these monopolies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Securities_Company

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil

My condolences for your narrative.

Re:California's housing bill SB 50 has died in the state Senate by kortilla on Saturday February 01, 2020 @04:28AM (#22209616)
I recommend you read the section from the Standard Oil article on the criticism of the breakup.

Also, your rebuke is pretty weak if you have one example compared to the thousands of government granted monopolies all over the US.

Re:California's housing bill SB 50 has died in the state Senate by pdonis on Friday January 31, 2020 @10:27AM (#22202423)
Exactly.