It's like the parent said "blah, blah blah, blah, I may (blah) not like Apple blah, blah, blah".
Re:I have seen the future and I am opposed
by coderdude on Tuesday February 15, 2011 @06:05AM
(#2220834)
You'll notice he's updated his about: "Don't participate anymore due to the hive mind, intolerance and lack of quality discussions here."
No, the parent propagated the dishonest claims about Apple that android fans like to spread, and for pointing out the truth I am downvoted and for attacking me personally, you are upvoted.
Frankly, if your ideas were superior, you wouldn't need to rely on lies and censorship to propagate them.
This tells us everything we need to know about the lack of integrity of the average HN poster.
I find the level of dishonesty quite disgusting.
> The app store doesn't let you make malicious or pornographic apps
How could Apple possibly prevent a sufficiently covertly malicious application from entering the app store?
They can't. And they really are quite liberal in their screening for the most part. But they are trying to provide a good experience for their customers.
Apple does this for two reasons. The first is, giving developers these tools outside of Apple's control, is beneficial to the platform. Apple wants as much developer focus as it can. The second reason, and probably more important, is that by having unrestricted app access, Apple provides the best solution for all of its customers. More apps means happier customers.
The app store doesn't let you make malicious or pornographic apps. The former doesn't benefit anyone, and the latter while a silly restriction is easily circumvented by using the web based platform.
Apple's walled garden is more a marketing slogan of Apple's competitors than anything else. Apple really doesn't care, because what apple does, is focus on the users. (which is why iOS is an open platform.)