> 1 & 2 are political decisions, fueled by "nucleophobia".

You say nuclear isn't dangerous because of all the safety measures, yet here you're qualifying those safety measures as mere overreaction.

> If it can solve global warming

Not to be pedantic, but nothing is going to solve it. We're talking about efforts to mitigate it.

I thought it’s more just that nuclear power plants aren’t economically or politically viable any more, since wealthy governments are no longer subsidizing them with their massive and growing nuclear weapons programs.