Re:Deep Decarbonization: A Realistic Way Forward on Climate ...
by bryanlarsen on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @10:37AM
(#22170322)
Far too late. 10 years to build is optimistic, and that is on top of a good decade or 2 of bureaucracy before even breaking ground.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Deep Decarbonization: A Realistic Way Forward on Climate ...
by manfredo on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @01:21PM
(#22172377)
France managed to bring its nuclear generation from close to 0% to over 75% in 15 years.
Re:Deep Decarbonization: A Realistic Way Forward on Climate ...
by Maximus9000 on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @01:37PM
(#22172584)
Interesting... actually, that is actually fairly compelling evidence that it can be done. Thanks!
For anyone interested, citation is here: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/read...
Re:Deep Decarbonization: A Realistic Way Forward on Climate ...
by bryanlarsen on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @01:42PM
(#22172649)
In the 1970's, yes. Nowadays it seems to take 10 years to build something as simple as a subway station.
Re:Deep Decarbonization: A Realistic Way Forward on Climate ...
by manfredo on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @01:48PM
(#22172707)
Technology hasn't regressed. Nuclear plants get built cheaper and faster on a per unit basis when they're built as part of a series of production. France built dozens of copies of the same four reactor designs. By comparison, many new projects are one off or part of only a single digit number of copies.