One of the related articles linked at the bottom of this article is https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/04/arts/design/germany-museu....

> [An] investigation by the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper found that many of the artifacts that will be on display in the Humboldt Forum, a huge new museum under construction in a rebuilt Berlin palace, had for years been stored in less-than-ideal conditions. The report featured searing depictions of flooded storage rooms and depots choked with toxic dust.

The irony of this is that European art pieces are probably rotting so we can display African potteries and rusty blades. For this reason alone we send all that stuff back (we keep the Egyptian stuff though).

Fires happen in important British collections too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_School_of_Art#Fires

A third of the worlds extant medieval manuscripts were destroyed by German artillery in Belgium in WW I and WW II. Both times the destruction was a deliberate punishment for Belgian resistence.

Clearly European savages cannot be trusted with their own history.

The concern is real but ultimately it does not matter. Fact of the matter is, arguments like this have been used to justify racism for a long time.

"They are Savage so they need our religion. They are savages so they need to put in the fields to work. They are savages so they don't need education. They are savages so their art should be displayed in our museum not theirs."

IMHO, the proper way for the British Museum to move forward would be to take the stance that repatriation of these looted artifacts is the explicit policy, and to define the process and necessary steps that need to happen for repatriation, be it the Rosetta Stone, the Elgin Marbles, the Benin Bronzes, etc. Repatriation should be a question of when, not if.

Unfortunately, I get the feeling that the British Museum doesn't have the same viewpoint--returning these looted artifacts would deprive them of their most valuable visitor draws, so they resort to any argument that will let them avoid repatriation. That viewpoint I very definitely do not agree with, and I do not condone in the slightest.

I agree; the Rosetta Stone should be returned by Britain to France, despite the fact they stole it more than 200 years ago.