> Seems like this is garbage.
They're called files.
> This is a weird and naively idealistic statement. On what platform has this now, or ever been true?
The web. Desktop software.
In both cases you are dealing with search engines, and VCs distorting the landscape, not to mention Google Safe browsing, etc.
Any computer I grew up with C64, Amiga, Atari, PC) was like this. My friends and I swapped floppy disks with stuff we made. Code, images, music. Then came dial-up mailboxes, then the web.
> It seems like iOS is at least as close to this ideal if not better than any other platform.
iOS is probably farthest away from this, actually.
Even on Android I can share some experiment with my friends and they can, after changing a single setting on their phone, install the APK I give them. Try this on iOS ...
Nobody has made a business that has succeeded by delivering APKs outside of a store, so that proves my point.
Reading his piece, it is easy to see that Apple hasn’t yet released an iPad Doctorow would like to buy, and I wouldn’t blame him for being who he is. He’s come to market looking for certain qualities in a tablet computer product, and found every iPad ever released to be lacking them. There’s no reason to spend money on something you’ll be unhappy with.
Principles that are not re-evaluated in context with a changing human society, are just dogma. I respect that, but I call it what it is.
If you want to live in the fair world where you get to keep (or give away) the stuff you buy, the iPad isn't for you.
Seems like this is garbage.
If you want to write code for a platform where the only thing that determines whether you're going to succeed with it is whether your audience loves it, the iPad isn't for you.
This is a weird and naively idealistic statement. On what platform has this now, or ever been true? It seems like iOS is at least as close to this ideal if not better than any other platform.
I wish we lived in the world he would like us to live in, but he seems to be out of touch with reality.