Re:Christopher Monsanto gives up trying to delete PL articles
by burgerbrain on Monday February 14, 2011 @02:45AM
(#2215835)
I repeat myself, but: "The damage is already done."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Christopher Monsanto gives up trying to delete PL articles
by j_baker on Monday February 14, 2011 @02:54AM
(#2215852)
You're not interested in an apology... You don't care that he stopped.
What exactly do you want from him then?
Re:Christopher Monsanto gives up trying to delete PL articles
by burgerbrain on Monday February 14, 2011 @02:57AM
(#2215860)
I am interested in an apology. He has not given one, despite this so called "reversal".
A sincere apology would involve 1) apologizing/admitting wrong-doing and 2) undoing the damage. I could certainly settle for only the second.
Re:Christopher Monsanto gives up trying to delete PL articles
by carussell on Monday February 14, 2011 @03:35AM
(#2215948)
Re your 2: it's not really up to Monsanto to restore the deleted articles. It's not his call, and if it went through Afd once, to recreate the articles would be to see them get redeleted.
Re:Christopher Monsanto gives up trying to delete PL articles
by intended on Monday February 14, 2011 @05:04AM
(#2216170)
But why would he apologize? He sees himself as following the letter of the law, and points out that if this is an issue, change the law.
Honestly this sounds like 2 things - A cry of help from Wikipedia stating they need concerted outside help/force to fix something they can see is broken/can be improved
A lawyer saying that its not his fault the rules are what they are.