News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel co... by ealexhudson on Monday January 27, 2020 @04:01AM (#22157849)
"A war situation" is precisely when you need this sort of thinking: the modern ethical framework for medical research with interventions is heavily influenced by "The Nuremberg Code". I don't think we need to describe in detail why people thought that code was necessary.

In most of these cases, it is highly unlikely that any significant number of the patients will withhold their consent: so to not ask it is basically saying "we can't be bothered", there's no obvious scientific basis for such a waiver. When patients are incapacitated there are equivalent frameworks which take their personal circumstances into consideration.

Re:Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel co... by danieltillett on Monday January 27, 2020 @04:14AM (#22157895)
There is nothing to suggest that any patient has withheld consent, just that the requirement to get consent in written form was waived. Given how sick these patients were this is reasonable.

Time is of the essence here. If I was put in the situation these researcher are in I would act first and take the risk of being put on trial later. Real ethics means sometimes you have to do more than just follow rules.

Re:Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel co... by pvaldes on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @06:31AM (#22168396)
Yup. "If you agree please cough in this paper" does not sound like a very smart move.