News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nobel laureates are 22 times more likely to have hobbies ... by DoreenMichele on Sunday January 26, 2020 @09:12PM (#22156351)
Which is not indicated in the title. The title is the thing I'm critiquing. I'm a writer. Titles are hard. I get that.

This one basically sucks -- IMO, of course.

Re:Nobel laureates are 22 times more likely to have hobbies ... by tjr on Sunday January 26, 2020 @09:22PM (#22156402)
It appears that the actual title of the article is "Hobbies are not distractions", with the HN submission title being... I'm not sure it's really a subtitle, maybe a pull-out point from the quoted reference in the article?

[Edit: though, since it looks like the author wrote both the article and the HN submission, this point might be somewhat irrelevant.] :-)

Re:Nobel laureates are 22 times more likely to have hobbies ... by DoreenMichele on Sunday January 26, 2020 @09:25PM (#22156409)
Thanks. I have sucktastic eyesight and only skimmed a bit.

So this is also a pointless violation of HN guidelines, which indicate you should use the original title unless it's clickbait or a few other provisos.

Re:Nobel laureates are 22 times more likely to have hobbies ... by DoreenMichele on Monday January 27, 2020 @02:20AM (#22157441)
Of course, "the first rule of downvotes is don't talk about the downvotes", but I've been genuinely puzzled by why this particular comment has so many downvotes. And I think it's because the title was changed at some point, apparently without a note being left anywhere indicating that. It didn't originally have the part about "compared to their peers".
Re:Nobel laureates are 22 times more likely to have hobbies ... by hola_mundo on Sunday January 26, 2020 @09:21PM (#22156391)
Ah, got it. Can’t argue with that!