Misleading. You have to appeal to pre-history to find temperature levels similar to current.
> Eventually we'll plunge into another glacial period, and no amount of CO2 will stop it.
Eventually, i.e. 10's or 100's of thousands of years, if CO2 levels revert to preindustrial.
You are appealing to timescales of thousands of years, but the timescale relevant to the problem and our response is years and decades. Is your comment intended to minimise the problem of current warming? If so why?
(Note: CO2 was at least 100 ppm lower than today yet the Arctic hit much higher temps and had to lose much of its ice as a result)
"Peak warmth occurred ~10 ka BP, with temperatures 7 °C warmer than today due to high radiative forcing and intensified inflow of warm Atlantic waters."
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/201...
Even if warming stopped now, Arctic and Antarctic would continue to melt for decades to come. Rate of change is key.
Your reference is also local (to the arctic), not global.
Again, what argument are you making here?
Is it: 1: It was warmer in the past / 1a: but nothing bad happened / 1b: therefore current warming is not due to human activity / 2: therefore there is no need to reduce CO2 levels.