News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blue–Green Distinction in Language by thaumasiotes on Thursday January 23, 2020 @06:44AM (#22126758)
> it has... verb modifiers!

> For example: use = to cause to work. Repair = to cause to be good. Understand = to cause to hear.

> Wow, am I telling you that verbs convey and encode causality in these languages? Yup, that's right.

This isn't really a feature of modern English, but it certainly isn't something exotic. It was a feature of earlier English, and the effects of that are still obvious today.

For example: raise = cause to rise. Fell = cause to fall. Lay = cause to lie. Drench = cause to drink.

(Causative verbs are alive and well in modern English, but they are more likely to be zero-derived than to use a separate overt grammatical form.)

Re:Blue–Green Distinction in Language by yorwba on Thursday January 23, 2020 @07:35AM (#22126987)
That earlier form of English was Proto-Germanic, where the grammatical regularity of causative verbs in Proto-Indo-European was still recognizable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causative#Proto-Germanic
Re:Blue–Green Distinction in Language by mikorym on Friday January 24, 2020 @05:22AM (#22136894)
What is the furthest that the modified verb can be from the original verb?

In Northern Sotho it gets pretty far:

nyaka = want

nyakišiša = investigate