Re:Was Paul Feyerabend Really Science's "Worst Enemy"? (2016)
by bencollier49 on Thursday January 23, 2020 @05:31AM
(#22126376)
Why the racial qualifier?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Was Paul Feyerabend Really Science's "Worst Enemy"? (2016)
by ggm on Thursday January 23, 2020 @05:42AM
(#22126426)
There are two tropes here: the dwm, and the whiner. Why do you think your whining is better than their pejorative?
Re:Was Paul Feyerabend Really Science's "Worst Enemy"? (2016)
by andrepd on Thursday January 23, 2020 @05:43AM
(#22126428)
Don't start a flame war.
Re:Was Paul Feyerabend Really Science's "Worst Enemy"? (2016)
by ggm on Thursday January 23, 2020 @07:40PM
(#22134135)
You're right. I regretted posting it shortly after.
Re:Was Paul Feyerabend Really Science's "Worst Enemy"? (2016)
by Yessing on Thursday January 23, 2020 @06:15AM
(#22126589)
the dwm? "Desktop Window Manager"?
Re:Was Paul Feyerabend Really Science's "Worst Enemy"? (2016)
by Yessing on Friday January 24, 2020 @03:45AM
(#22136495)
to clarify I'm asking about the meaning of dwm. The only term that I'm familiar with, and that shows up in google is
Desktop Window Manager.
Re:Was Paul Feyerabend Really Science's "Worst Enemy"? (2016)
by ggm on Friday January 24, 2020 @04:26PM
(#22142623)
https://public.oed.com/blog/march-2014-update-new-words-note...
The phrase dead white male (abbreviated DWM), has been used since the mid-1980s as a term of disparagement for male authors and academics of European ancestry whose pre-eminence, especially in academic study, is challenged as being disproportionate to their cultural significance, and attributed to a historical bias in favour of their gender and ethnicity.