News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. to let airlines limit service animals on planes by m463 on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @09:25PM (#22124267)
I'm not opposed to service animals in any way, but this is purely a money grab:

> Spirit Airlines Inc told regulators it lost “millions of dollars in pet carriage fees from passengers fraudulently claiming their ‘house pets are service or support animals.’”

They just want the pet fee to let an animal in a carrier replace the normal underseat luggage.

I'm not sure what the fee is for Spirit Airlines, but for United Airlines it is $125 each direction.

Re:U.S. to let airlines limit service animals on planes by ApolloFortyNine on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @09:32PM (#22124303)
$125 is steep, but if you have a dog that sheds, it's hard to argue it wouldn't be harder to clean up all that hair versus cleaning up after your average passenger.
Re:U.S. to let airlines limit service animals on planes by akamia on Thursday January 23, 2020 @12:27AM (#22125090)
You're required to keep the dog in the bag under the seat for the entire flight so they shouldn't really affect cleaning.

I have two issues with the fee.

1) It only covers one way. For a round trip itinerary you are looking at $250 - $400 for the pet fee. That can be more expensive than the actual ticket.

2) Your pet counts as your carry on item. I would be a little less bothered if the dog was allowed in addition to your carry on and personal items or if the airline included a free checked bag with the fee to offset the carry on. Since the dog counts as your carry on, you have to pay an additional $25+ each way to check a bag you might've otherwise carried on the plane.

Re:U.S. to let airlines limit service animals on planes by gok on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @09:35PM (#22124319)
That's $125 and you have to keep the dog locked up in a bag the entire flight, so I don't see how it could affect their cleaning.
Re:U.S. to let airlines limit service animals on planes by cyphar on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @11:09PM (#22124787)
On the other hand, it does mean that effective ticket prices would now be more expensive for people who have service animals. While not necessarily malicious, it is a form of discrimination. Airlines don't charge overweight passengers extra for seatbelt extenders.