Re:Ontology for the life sciences: genes, proteins, diseases...
by bordercases on Tuesday January 21, 2020 @12:53AM
(#22104592)
> Life science could use a benevolent dictator.
If there's going to be one it has to be the NIH. Since they've been investing a lot in this field.
I've come across things a simple as "I wrote a Perl script that does that, but it uses KEGG not GO terms" for their reasoning. That, or – if they're okay with using gene ontology – we have to also use the other system in parallel. And then the results becomes a discussion of how the two different annotation systems display the results.
Life science could use a benevolent dictator.