I honestly do not see the point you are arguing "for" here. I understand you find wrong the hype about webassembly and many of you comparison are adequate.

You say that wasm is a political "bastard" born out of mozilla refusal for PNaCL. I disagree, but it is a way of looking at history.

But then my stance would be that to satisfy the w in wasm it Needs to be a political chimera, the whole web is predicated on the model of vendors fighting political and technical battles over standard. PNaCL lost that battle, Java lost miserably that battle, every other portable assembly ever never even participated.

Are you criticizing wasm or the open web?