News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Dynamic type systems are not inherently more open. Parent comment

Re:Dynamic type systems are not inherently more open by arminiusreturns on Sunday January 19, 2020 @12:02PM (#22092429)
What about JIT things like lisps? Maybe the benefits of dynamic typing are more geared towards things with a repl in particular?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dynamic type systems are not inherently more open by leshow on Sunday January 19, 2020 @12:48PM (#22092710)
There are static languages with REPLs, Haskell's GHC has a particularly good one.
[ Parent | on HN ]