Re:Using Standard HTML (1997)
by judge2020 on Sunday January 19, 2020 @09:46AM
(#22091670)
Maybe it's the ffmpeg apng muxer but it almost seems like gif does a better job a compression compared to apng, making apng only solve one problem (AFAIK): the color limitations. See this example: https://gist.github.com/judge2020/a78adb07ae60244a5660fb631f...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
PNG has two (commonly used modes): 256 colors or true color. A 256 color PNG beats a GIF in compression, but for many images a 2^32 color PNG takes more space than a 256 color GIF. This holds true both for still images and animations.
This leads to a curious situation where PNG beats GIF at anything GIF can do, yet still disappoints people.