Does that make logo the sole truly successful form of m-expressions?
Re:Lisping at JPL (2002)
by lonelappde on Monday January 20, 2020 @03:43PM
(#22101941)
No, because m+expressions are syntax and logo has a different syntax, and because Mathematica is a successful use of something much closer to m-expressions.
There were some later small implementations (e.g. for the Apple II) that were written from scratch and didn't need to implement all of Lisp (e.g. lambda, plists, etc).