I cannot refute your comment, because it is not actually clear what you are referring to. Your comment is too vague to be useful; it barely conveys information above a sentiment.

An unfalsifiable theory is useless. An unfalsifiable comment equally so.

There is a term for this (invented by Pauli): “not even wrong”.

I'm literally repeating words and phrases from the talk.

You just clearly demonstrated that you did NOT watch the entire talk through to the end. What OP stated is in fact present in the talk itself.

> Please point out my

If you really need someone to point this stuff out then you can start by looking at your puerile jab regarding merit, but I'm not sure you're inclined to contribute constructively to conversations.