Re:Pornhub sued by deaf man over adult video site's alleged ...
by zweep on Saturday January 18, 2020 @03:48AM
(#22083258)
Are you seriously suggesting that a charity kitchen dispensing pork should be illegal?
Re:Pornhub sued by deaf man over adult video site's alleged ...
by ta999999171 on Saturday January 18, 2020 @01:57AM
(#22082848)
> Consider instead a charity kitchen in a town with a fairly substantial Jewish or Muslim community, but the charity kitchen insists on serving pork.
...less sympathetic than GP's example, religion is a choice.
Re:Pornhub sued by deaf man over adult video site's alleged ...
by HarryHirsch on Saturday January 18, 2020 @11:24AM
(#22085244)
religion is a choice
That's true for both sides. Why someone would do charity but leave a well-defined group out of it is a mystery.
Re:Pornhub sued by deaf man over adult video site's alleged ...
by jolmg on Monday January 20, 2020 @02:05PM
(#22101267)
How about, instead of a charity kitchen, it's a restaurant that gives away its leftovers? If they only have pork leftovers, should they not give those away to those in need? By disallowing them, their choice would either be to throw the food in the trash or obtain other food to give away in addition to the pork. Of course, most businesses would just shrug and throw it away.
Here are some statistics about hearing loss: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics...
They are enlightening. 25 % of people between 65 and 75 are hearing-impaired, rising to 50 % of people over 75. What exactly is the argument for excluding the aged from Berkeley's online offerings? It would be wiser to argue in favour of accommodation for disabilities because it may be that you will need them sometime in the future.