Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by swiley on Friday January 17, 2020 @10:01AM
(#22075121)
Isn't that tampering with evidence? Don't "normal people" get in trouble for similar things?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by makomk on Friday January 17, 2020 @10:27AM
(#22075384)
Define "normal people". From what I remember of the emails that were obtained about this, the server was wiped as part of a post-compromise remediation plan by university IT security staff.
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by pbourke on Friday January 17, 2020 @10:39AM
(#22075523)
Normal people are those who are not wealthy or politically connected such that issues like this can be made to disappear.
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by ianai on Friday January 17, 2020 @10:05AM
(#22075159)
Yes. That’s exactly what this is.
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by lanternslight on Friday January 17, 2020 @11:04AM
(#22075789)
Us Secretary of State didn't, so I guess politicians play with a different time book
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by pjc50 on Friday January 17, 2020 @03:52PM
(#22079152)
These rules do not seem to be evenly or systematically enforced. https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/25/trumps-most-senior-staff...
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by pstuart on Friday January 17, 2020 @11:18AM
(#22075935)
The buttery males? Oh my, that was a national security disaster! /s
Edit: actually, she did get in "trouble". That faux controversy helped sway the election against her.
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by travisoneill1 on Friday January 17, 2020 @11:45AM
(#22076257)
You think violating State Department information security procedures is not a big deal?
Re:Georgia election server showed signs of tampering, expert...
by pstuart on Friday January 17, 2020 @01:40PM
(#22077694)
It is a significant deal. She wasn't alone in doing so (her predecessors had engaged in similar behavior to a degree as well). What's interesting is that the heat and light about it wasn't followed by any legislative/policy action of note. It's almost like they weren't trying to right a wrong, but to politically assassinate her.
The sitting president communicates on an unsecured iPhone. The WH staff is using alternate email systems and messaging to actively avoid leaving a trail.
Let me know your concern about that and I'm happy to continue this conversation. Otherwise, you're engaging in partisan politics here and that's not good for HN.