Re:The Boring Company’s Las Vegas tunnel is nearly 50% done
by jacques_chester on Friday January 17, 2020 @06:41PM
(#22080879)
I've thought the same for a while. A lot of the expense in upgrading rail cars, replacing frigates, building hospitals etc comes from the fact that every such project has massively expensive organisation constructed around it and then ... it's thrown away.
The Project Production Institute take a similar view: that instead of modeling a project as a fixed thing, you focus on it as a production process.
Re:The Boring Company’s Las Vegas tunnel is nearly 50% done
by vl on Friday January 17, 2020 @01:55AM
(#22072474)
But why there is a need to paint it all the time?
Re:The Boring Company’s Las Vegas tunnel is nearly 50% done
by thereisnospork on Friday January 17, 2020 @04:08PM
(#22079355)
To make up some numbers: Assume that a paint job lasts 20 years. So if it takes a team of five 20 years to paint the bridge by the time they've reached the end the beginning will need a new coat.
Otherwise every 20 years they would need to hire, train, then fire 200 painters for a 6 month-long paint job project. 200 painters, managers, and etc. who will invariably be less experienced with the finer points of painting said bridge since they don't do it every day.
[0] Best example of this sort of logic that I have seen implemented is painting the golden gate bridge, just one properly sized and experienced crew painting from one end to the other and back again without the boondoggle.