Drinking 1% rather than 2% milk accounts for 4.5 years of less aging in adults

Re:Drinking 1% rather than 2% milk accounts for 4.5 years of... by pdpi on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @01:01PM (#22056563)

> Only if we first hypothesize the correlation, or collect the data necessary to make the connection, can we even attempt to control for it.

If only we had some way to know which confounding factors the original authors accounted for. Oh wait, that's what RTFAing achieves.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Drinking 1% rather than 2% milk accounts for 4.5 years of... by jlmorton on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @02:11PM (#22057382)

That's not really the point. They attempted to control for demographics, and for dietary covariates like protein, total dietary fat, fiber, and saturated fat. But that is a tiny sliver of the possibly correlated factors.

Did they control for the possibility that 1% milk drinkers learned to drink 1% milk at a young age, and that population happens to live in areas further away from sources of pollution, even in comparison with other households in the same income quintile? Did they control for blood lead levels in childhood?

The point is that we don't know what the covariates are. We have no way to even approach the problem.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Drinking 1% rather than 2% milk accounts for 4.5 years of... by lukego on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @01:11PM (#22056692)

I'm with GP. I'd read the study if they did an experiment - randomly assigned milk to people and watched the impact - but there's too little value in these purely observational studies from nutritionists. The field hasn't grown up yet.

[ Parent | on HN ]