Re:Drinking 1% rather than 2% milk accounts for 4.5 years of...
by iron0013 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @01:42PM
(#22057047)
It depends on the effect sizes, but in most contexts 5k participants is considered a very sufficient sample. You don’t need millions of participants to study things like this.
I'm no expert but my initial reaction would be that you need more than 5834 adults in a study that controls for all of those factors. We don't really know how household size, for example, would affect the results, so wouldn't you need a bunch of test data to analyze all of the combinations? Or did they only study people who are the same in most of them? (i.e. 45, male, with a household size of 4, nonsmoking, etc...)
Would love to hear from someone more informed on this than myself.