News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by scarface74 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @11:39AM (#22055696)
Allowing third parties to intercept your SMS messages has been a security nightmare for Android.

But yes you can install a third party app like Google Voice with its own phone number and send text messages through it.

You would really trust any third party to intercept your sms messages?

On top of that, the third party dialer integrates with the native dialer and call history.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by simion314 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @01:38PM (#22057013)
>You would really trust any third party to intercept your sms messages?

Not OP but I trust Thunderbird on my PC to access my emails so why I could not also trust a Mozilla or other trustworthy company to access my messages on my phone where in my case the SMS is used by companies to send me notifications about billing , I am the type of person that will call someone(people in my group don't send SMS)

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by scarface74 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @02:39PM (#22057674)
So Apple should allow random third parties to intercept SMS messages because “people in your group” don’t use SMS?
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by simion314 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @03:04PM (#22057898)
Apple should let me decide or maybe review Thunderbird and Firefox and allow them. I am wondering how can you bring this argument and at the same time you install random apps on your computer that are not made or restricted by Apple.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by scarface74 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @04:42PM (#22059042)
That’s kind of my point. I’m very careful about what I install on my computer. I don’t install random crap on my computer from untrusted sources because of the lack of a sandbox.

I install any random crap on my phone and tablet because I know they can’t do too much damage between the better permission model and sandboxing.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by simion314 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @06:03PM (#22059797)
>I install any random crap on my phone and tablet because I know they can’t do too much damage between the better permission model and sandboxing.

And how say allowing a reviewed and sandboxed Firefox or a side loaded version that I would enable using some convoluted steps affects you personally? I don't demand Apple to make you less secure just want competition and no restriction, if I need say a power tool like a firewall or to run some custom scripts as root let me as a power user do that in a way you won't be affected - there must be such a solution because I do not see OSX user getting hacked left and right.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by scarface74 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @06:46PM (#22060157)
I don't demand Apple to make you less secure just want competition and no restriction,

There is competition - you can choose the same mobile operating system that 85% of mobile users choose - Android.

there must be such a solution because I do not see OSX user getting hacked left and right.

A company you may have heard of corrupted user’s operating systems if they had system integrity protection turned off....

https://support.google.com/chrome/thread/15235262?hl=en

Or another “trustworthy” company installed a web server surreptitiously on users computers so even when they uninstalled the software, it reinstalled itself.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.zdnet.com/google-amp/articl...