But more importantly- the distinction you are making does not explain anything. Regardless of whether inorganic matter has experiences, there aren't any observable phenomena that have outcomes that are effected. You can make a claim one way or the other, and the world behaves the same regardless. I tend to fall toward the stance of logical positivism on this one.
Your very special organs are nothing but melted snow(water) deforming against broken up rock(carbon), repeatedly, in beautiful fractal patterns that have emerged through evolutionary processes over billions of years.
These evolutionary processes that turned Snow into You.
The _information_ is higher order deformation.
I won't give you more than you can chew. Accepting that process=experience is already a huge paradigm shift.
If you're interested in deeper implications, it's better if you come to them without anyone handing them over.
This is the part where materialism has the burden of proof to explain a mechanism for how, suddenly, snow doesn't experience de-formation.
You get it. You've made the logical link of connections from human down to snow, and you see no mechanism for a sudden loss of the ability to experience.
The rational answer is to say that provided what we know about the universe right now, it seems that there is nothing that does not have the property of experience.
The only other rational answer is solipsism because there's no real evidence that anything other than your self has any experience, but that's no fun and doesn't have any interesting conclusions.