News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why the foundations of physics have not progressed for 40... by XorNot on Monday January 13, 2020 @10:00PM (#22041408)
Honestly why is popularity not a good mechanism to determine how we allocate experimental investment?

If a large cadre of highly educated people find a particular theoretical mechanism sufficiently compelling to dedicate their careers and time to it, then surely that's a good basis on which to develop experiments to try and confirm whether it's right? Because the benefit of proving it wrong means they'll reallocate their resources.

Re:Why the foundations of physics have not progressed for 40... by cynusx on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @11:21AM (#22046229)
well, the author argues it is not optimal due to human fallacies such as group-think and institutional incentives

Presumably the economical cost of the experiments are higher at this point then the resource-allocation of that cadre of highly educated people.

It's worth thinking about, but not sure if there is a viable alternative methodology to be found