I'm trying to understand the OP's perspective... I've always thought of Earnest Capital as an investment company that's differentiated by being founder-friendly? Are you under a different perspective?

So it seems like if they only hit it off with X founders then they should only invest in X companies/founders? They're putting the emphasis on living with people as opposed to quick exits?

So it seems like @bentossel's review of them should mean a lot more than the number of investments or the dollar amounts?

One problem that investors, revenue and profit can't always fix is working with terrible people, btw.