Re:Think Debtors Prisons Are a Thing of the Past? Not in Mis...
by JamesBarney on Sunday January 12, 2020 @12:25PM
(#22027522)
Say I did a bunch of work for your company. And you stiff me for $10,000. I can't just go immediately seize your back account. I first have to establish in the court of law that you owe me money.
So I'd sue you and the judge would award me $10,000. But he would award me the $10,000 as court ordered judgement which is the legal instrument that proves you owe me money.
So that line doesn't mean quite what you think it means.
Re:Think Debtors Prisons Are a Thing of the Past? Not in Mis...
by wutbrodo on Sunday January 12, 2020 @01:31AM
(#22024841)
Huh, TIL, for some reason I always thought they were for general debt.
Re:Think Debtors Prisons Are a Thing of the Past? Not in Mis...
by rtpg on Sunday January 12, 2020 @11:33PM
(#22031854)
This would actually happen. Usually the person you owe money to would drag you to court and then get you thrown in a debtors prison.
I guess my point was that you could end up there for civil or criminal things.
Re:Think Debtors Prisons Are a Thing of the Past? Not in Mis...
by SamReidHughes on Sunday January 12, 2020 @06:49PM
(#22030615)
YYDL, actually. They were for general debt.
This is functionally what debtors prisons were used for
From the wiki summary:
> Destitute persons who were unable to pay a court-ordered judgment would be incarcerated in these prisons until they had worked off their debt via labour or secured outside funds to pay the balance