Re:A Man Who’s Spending $1B to Own Every Pop Song
by netcan on Saturday January 11, 2020 @02:43PM
(#22021839)
Depends on what you mean by "rent seeking."
Liberal economists use this term the most, they usually mean large companies trying to get goodies from the state. Lefty ones tend to mean something like "profiteering."
X-as-a-service businesses models aren't exactly new in intellectual property. The patent/copyright systems explicitly assume licensing and royalties. But, I agree that subscriptions are pretty new in consumer-land.
But we need a different term rent seeking already has competing usages.
Re:A Man Who’s Spending $1B to Own Every Pop Song
by prepend on Saturday January 11, 2020 @03:16PM
(#22022008)
Rent seeking [0] typically means exploiting a captive market without providing value. I don’t think that fits either of your definitions. The key piece is they basically squeeze without proving value. So buying IP and then upping the rent fits that.
Re:A Man Who’s Spending $1B to Own Every Pop Song
by rhizome on Saturday January 11, 2020 @04:35PM
(#22022485)
>they usually mean large companies trying to get goodies from the state
I think here you might be thinking of Regulatory Capture.
Re:A Man Who’s Spending $1B to Own Every Pop Song
by klarstrup on Saturday January 11, 2020 @08:31PM
(#22023799)
Property(intellectual and otherwise) enforcement _is_ a goody from the state, by the by
Virtually every company is moving toward this model - Microsoft, Adobe, Disney, etc. That's my main complaint.