Re:Tanka: Our way of deploying to Kubernetes
by mdaniel on Friday January 10, 2020 @05:28PM
(#22016295)
For those who don't already have an account on that slack, then going to https://cuelang.org/community/ appears to be the place one will find the magic invite link: https://join.slack.com/t/cuelang/shared_invite/enQtNzQwODc3N...
off(but actually on)-topic: I can't wait for the use of slack for open source communities to die in a fire, not only because the onboarding experience is horrible, and search is a mess, but about 75% of them appear to be the non-paid flavor so old messages are just held for ransom
Re:Tanka: Our way of deploying to Kubernetes
by zapita on Friday January 10, 2020 @05:48PM
(#22016465)
I completely agree with you on slack for open-source projects. Especially with Mattermost being so good, there’s no good reason for a project to stick to Slack.
Re:Tanka: Our way of deploying to Kubernetes
by mdaniel on Saturday January 11, 2020 @01:06AM
(#22018455)
Even Mattermost doesn't offer free accounts to open source projects[1], and I think it's the _hosting_ that keeps projects off of almost any of the open source solutions. But one of the principals of Zulip almost always weighs in on discussions to point out that they have free hosting for any open source project that wants to use it: https://zulipchat.com/for/open-source/#free-hosting-at-zulip... and seem to even offer "import from slack" to make it less painful to switch.
1 = https://mattermost.com/nonprofit/ asks for a $390 "setup fee" and only for 1,000 users
I am also impressed by the clip at which CUE is improving, and how useful it already is, in spite of its relatively young age. It reminds me of Python or Go in its focus on tooling quality, and stability.
Their community slack is very welcoming, too. https://cuelang.slack.com